From: | Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> |
---|---|
To: | Jean-Michel Pouré <jm(at)poure(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: MySQL Compatibility WAS: 8.5 release timetable, again |
Date: | 2009-08-27 16:35:49 |
Message-ID: | 3073cc9b0908270935j48c3395u9f33d1c51d41eb48@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2009/8/27 Jean-Michel Pouré <jm(at)poure(dot)com>:
>
> Otherwise, replicating some MySQL SQL syntax will not work.
>
> As you know, people willing to use PostgreSQL replication are possibly
> already MySQL replication users. So if they test and PostgreSQL fails,
> this is too bad.
>
yeah! but some times the reason MySQL is not failing on those cases is
because it's broken...
Consider this one:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2005-12/msg00487.php
we don't want to copy the bugs nor the bad designs decisions from
MySQL, no that everything from MySQL is bad but i would be scary if we
start supporting every single piece of code MySQL accepts
--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2009-08-27 16:47:30 | Re: [pgsql-hackers] Daily digest v1.9418 (15 messages) |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2009-08-27 16:30:55 | Re: pretty print viewdefs |