From: | Rob Wultsch <wultsch(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> |
Cc: | Jean-Michel Pouré <jm(at)poure(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: MySQL Compatibility WAS: 8.5 release timetable, again |
Date: | 2009-08-27 18:39:22 |
Message-ID: | 2c5ef4e30908271139u5deca324h43d13cb7f54fd16d@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2009/8/27 Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>:
> 2009/8/27 Jean-Michel Pouré <jm(at)poure(dot)com>:
>>
>> Otherwise, replicating some MySQL SQL syntax will not work.
>>
>> As you know, people willing to use PostgreSQL replication are possibly
>> already MySQL replication users. So if they test and PostgreSQL fails,
>> this is too bad.
>>
>
> yeah! but some times the reason MySQL is not failing on those cases is
> because it's broken...
> Consider this one:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2005-12/msg00487.php
>
> we don't want to copy the bugs nor the bad designs decisions from
> MySQL, no that everything from MySQL is bad but i would be scary if we
> start supporting every single piece of code MySQL accepts
>
And that behavior has changed to be sane in 5.0+, iirc.
--
Rob Wultsch
wultsch(at)gmail(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Werner Echezuria | 2009-08-27 18:45:19 | return a set of records |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2009-08-27 18:37:02 | Re: pretty print viewdefs |