From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Back-patch support for python 2.5? |
Date: | 2007-10-14 19:10:39 |
Message-ID: | 3064.1192389039@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I noticed that two of the buildfarm members are failing the 8.1
>> branch because they're trying to build plpython with python 2.5. To
>> get that to work, I think we'd need to back-patch these two fixes:
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2006-11/msg00165.php
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-04/msg00043.php
>> Is that worth doing? Should we go further back than 8.1?
> Those who need Python 2.5 can use PostgreSQL 8.2.
Not being a Python user, I don't really care. I notice though that the
second of the above-mentioned patches is only in HEAD, which is why
those same machines are giving scary-looking warnings in the 8.2 branch,
eg wasp on 8.2:
ccache gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wendif-labels -fno-strict-aliasing -g -fpic -I. -I/usr/include/python2.5 -I../../../src/include -D_GNU_SOURCE -I/usr/include/et -c -o plpython.o plpython.c
plpython.c:1996: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
plpython.c:1998: warning: 'intargfunc' is deprecated
plpython.c:1998: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
plpython.c:1999: warning: 'intargfunc' is deprecated
plpython.c:1999: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
plpython.c:2000: warning: 'intintargfunc' is deprecated
plpython.c:2000: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
plpython.c:2001: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
plpython.c:2002: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
Seems we should at least back-patch Marko's fixes into 8.2.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-10-14 19:34:11 | rolcanlogin vs. the flat password file |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2007-10-14 17:18:57 | Re: Back-patch support for python 2.5? |