Re: Back-patch support for python 2.5?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Back-patch support for python 2.5?
Date: 2007-10-14 22:02:15
Message-ID: 200710150002.15642.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> I notice though that the
> second of the above-mentioned patches is only in HEAD, which is why
> those same machines are giving scary-looking warnings in the 8.2
> branch, eg wasp on 8.2:

The CVS log message for that says "Allow PL/PythonU to compile on Python
2.5.", but that is evidently not true. Is this just a warning cleanup,
or is there perhaps a 32 vs 64 bit issue that is being fixed there?

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2007-10-14 22:16:04 Re: rolcanlogin vs. the flat password file
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-10-14 21:56:10 Re: rolcanlogin vs. the flat password file