From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: renaming configure.in to configure.ac |
Date: | 2020-07-15 13:45:54 |
Message-ID: | 3057335.1594820754@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> It was mentioned elsewhere in passing that a new Autoconf release might
> be coming. That one will warn about the old naming "configure.in" and
> request "configure.ac". So we might want to rename that sometime.
> Before we get into the specifics, I suggest that all interested parties
> check whether buildfarm scripts, packaging scripts, etc. need to be
> adjusted for the newer name.
Along the same line, I read at [1]
Because it has been such a long time, and because some of the changes
potentially break existing Autoconf scripts, we are conducting a
public beta test before the final release of version 2.70. Please
test this beta with your autoconf scripts, and report any problems you
find to the Savannah bug tracker:
Maybe we should do some pro-active testing, rather than just waiting for
2.70 to get dropped on us? God knows how long it will be until 2.71.
regards, tom lane
[1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf/2020-07/msg00006.html
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2020-07-15 13:47:25 | Re: Improve handling of parameter differences in physical replication |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2020-07-15 13:39:11 | Re: renaming configure.in to configure.ac |