From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, sandeep(dot)thakkar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) |
Date: | 2018-08-21 21:58:00 |
Message-ID: | 303572b3-89a5-6177-d46a-e23b2b4d6caa@2ndQuadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
On 08/21/2018 04:49 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2018-08-21 11:09:15 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> On 08/21/2018 11:06 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> XP at least is essentially a dead platform for us. My animals are not
>>> able to build anything after release 10.
>> I wouldn't think XP should even be on our list anymore. Microsoft hasn't
>> supported it in 4 years.
> XP isn't the only thing relevant here, vista and 2008 R1 are in the same
> class.
>
I do have a machine in my laptop graveyard with Vista. The only WS2008
instace I have available is R2 and AWS doesn't seem to have any AMIs for R1.
Honestly, I don't think these matter terribly much. Anyone building now
is not likely to be targeting them.
Of the buildfarm animals, dory looks OK, hamerkop, bowerbird and thrips
look not ok, and whelk and woodlouse look borderline.
I'm perfectly prepared to upgrade bowerbird if necessary.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jerry Jelinek | 2018-08-21 23:13:56 | Re: patch to allow disable of WAL recycling |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2018-08-21 20:49:36 | Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-08-21 23:29:52 | Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2018-08-21 20:49:36 | Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) |