Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, sandeep(dot)thakkar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)
Date: 2018-08-21 20:49:36
Message-ID: 20180821204936.tqdmjolkoo2sv5og@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

On 2018-08-21 11:09:15 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On 08/21/2018 11:06 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > XP at least is essentially a dead platform for us. My animals are not
> > able to build anything after release 10.
>
> I wouldn't think XP should even be on our list anymore. Microsoft hasn't
> supported it in 4 years.

XP isn't the only thing relevant here, vista and 2008 R1 are in the same
class.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2018-08-21 21:58:00 Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)
Previous Message Shawn Debnath 2018-08-21 18:48:36 Re: Proposal: SLRU to Buffer Cache

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2018-08-21 21:58:00 Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)
Previous Message Andres Freund 2018-08-21 18:10:05 Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)