From: | Achilleas Mantzios <achill(at)matrix(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Nelson Green <nelsongreen84(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Storing small image files |
Date: | 2013-05-09 15:20:06 |
Message-ID: | 3013951.boN74A8FSJ@smadev.internal.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
why not bytea?
much more control, much more information, IMHO.
In our DB evolving from an initial 7.1 back in 2001, and currently on 9.0,
we have been storing everything binary in bytea's.
There are downsides in both solutions, you just have to have good reasons
to not use bytea.
On Πεμ 09 Μαΐ 2013 10:04:18 Nelson Green wrote:
Good morning list,
I am designing a system that will have a table for security badges, and we want to store the ID badge photo. These are small files, averaging about 500K in size. We have made the decision to store the image as a BLOB in the table itself for a variety of reasons. However, I am having trouble understanding just how to do that.
The table structures:
CREATE TABLE employee
(
employee_id INTEGER NOT NULL,
employee_lastname VARCHAR(35) NOT NULL,
employee_firstname VARCHAR(35) NOT NULL,
employee_mi CHAR(1),
PRIMARY KEY (employee_id)
);
CREATE TABLE security_badge
(
badge_number CHAR(10) NOT NULL,
employee_id INTEGER NOT NULL
REFERENCES employee(employee_id),
badge_photo ????,
PRIMARY KEY (badge_number)
);
What datatype should I use for the badge_photo (bytea?), and what are the commands to insert the picture accessing the server remotely through psql, and to retrieve the photos as well, please?
Thanks,
Nelson
-
Achilleas Mantzios
IT DEV
IT DEPT
Dynacom Tankers Mgmt
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2013-05-09 15:30:30 | Re: Does it make sense to break a large query into separate functions? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-05-09 15:15:35 | Re: Does it make sense to break a large query into separate functions? |