| From: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pascal Scheffers <pascal(at)scheffers(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump ordering problem (rc4) |
| Date: | 2001-04-14 01:43:02 |
| Message-ID: | 3.0.5.32.20010414114302.00ccf1d0@mail.rhyme.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 21:15 13/04/01 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> At 17:34 13/04/01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> >
>> >A possible kluge answer is to make pg_dump's OID-ordering of views
>> >depend on the OID of the view rule rather than the view relation.
>> >I am not sure if that would break any cases that work now, however.
>> >
>>
>> This seems good to me; it should be based on the 'oid of the view', and
>> AFAICT, the rule OID should be it. Should I do this?
>
>The view oid is certainly better than the base relation oid.
>
Since I'm in pg_dump at the moment, I'll make the change...
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Philip Warner | 2001-04-14 01:44:18 | Re: pg_dump, formats & blobs |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-04-14 01:16:31 | NetBSD "Bad address" failure (was Re: Third call for platform testing) |