| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pascal Scheffers <pascal(at)scheffers(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump ordering problem (rc4) |
| Date: | 2001-04-14 01:15:21 |
| Message-ID: | 200104140115.VAA21460@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> At 17:34 13/04/01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> >A possible kluge answer is to make pg_dump's OID-ordering of views
> >depend on the OID of the view rule rather than the view relation.
> >I am not sure if that would break any cases that work now, however.
> >
>
> This seems good to me; it should be based on the 'oid of the view', and
> AFAICT, the rule OID should be it. Should I do this?
The view oid is certainly better than the base relation oid.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-04-14 01:16:31 | NetBSD "Bad address" failure (was Re: Third call for platform testing) |
| Previous Message | Philip Warner | 2001-04-14 00:36:50 | Re: pg_dump ordering problem (rc4) |