Re: Schemas (Re: AW: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1)

From: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Schemas (Re: AW: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1)
Date: 2000-11-09 17:02:46
Message-ID: 3.0.5.32.20001110040246.03425100@mail.rhyme.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 17:34 9/11/00 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
>The thing you get from initdb is a "cluster of catalogs", a database is a
>"catalog", a schema is something below a catalog. (There is no such
>thing as an "environment" as a hierarchy level.)

I think that's what SQL99 calls the 'cluster of catalogs'.

>I think all people that were interested in this issue agreed with this.
>(If not, you better speak up, because I'd like to see schemas implemented
>ASAP.)

Nope. Ross's links cover the issues I wanted to ask about.

Thanks.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-11-09 17:17:02 Re: problems with configure
Previous Message Philip Warner 2000-11-09 16:59:36 Re: AW: AW: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1