| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pete(dot)forman(at)westgeo(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: problems with configure |
| Date: | 2000-11-09 17:17:02 |
| Message-ID: | 11500.973790222@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> pete(dot)forman(at)westgeo(dot)com writes:
>> Depending on the version of Solaris and the compiler flags the third
>> argument can be a pointer to socklen_t, void, size_t or int.
> I think what I'm going to do is this: The argument is question cannot
> possibly be of a different width than int, unless someone is *really* on
> drugs at Sun. Therefore, if the third argument to accept() is "void *"
> then we just take "int".
Sounds like a plan to me.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-11-09 18:20:43 | Re: refcnt leak ? |
| Previous Message | Philip Warner | 2000-11-09 17:02:46 | Re: Schemas (Re: AW: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1) |