Re: [HACKERS] psql variables fixed (?)

At 03:08 AM 1/15/00 +0000, Thomas Lockhart wrote:

>I'd be a little reluctant to give up the alternate "::" syntax, only
>because I'm not sure I trust the standards folks to not stomp on the
>alternative at some point in the future. (Sorry about the
>double-negative, but it says what I mean :)

Which begs the question ... does Postgres.org have representation
on the standards commitees?

Whether or not there's money available for development, I should
think minimal funding for participation in the standards committee
(i.e. travel and per-diem, maybe not a salary) wouldn't be hard to
scare up...

- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net.