| From: | Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Jeff Hoffmann <jeff(at)remapcorp(dot)com>, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] has anybody else used r-tree indexes in 6.5? |
| Date: | 1999-06-19 04:18:42 |
| Message-ID: | 3.0.1.32.19990618211842.00dd03b0@mail.pacifier.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 11:11 PM 6/18/99 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>We are sitting around at this point, just tweeking things, and have no
>major need to rush into a minor release to fix problems because we don't
>have a flood of identical bug reports that have users screaming.
Actually, I noticed this also. I don't have experience with your
earlier release attempts, but there were enough "wink, wink - we'll
be busy chasing initial release bugs" type comments to make me wonder.
This release is ... somewhat mature. And you seem to be capturing
areas that regression testing doesn't touch. I don't have to tell
you that the writing of tests is of crucial importance (though of
course entirely inadequate!).
I'm really impressed with this release...
- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Nature photos, on-line guides, and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-06-19 04:19:08 | Re: commits |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-06-19 04:16:10 | Re: commits |