| From: | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Steve Crawford" <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again" |
| Date: | 2008-12-01 20:05:48 |
| Message-ID: | 2f4958ff0812011205x5105590cr76a6ec54cfaf4913@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Steve Crawford <
scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com> wrote:
>
> http://monty-says.blogspot.com/2008/11/oops-we-did-it-again-mysql-51-released.html
>
> All interesting, but especially the part about half-way down under the
> heading "So what went wrong with MySQL 5.1 ?" - must-read for anyone
> involved in selecting a database.
>
well, at least they have replication and partitioning built in. How reliable
it is, is completely another story - but still, they are a step ahead in
that regard.
Now I know why Tom Lane doesn't have a blog :)
--
GJ
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2008-12-01 20:16:10 | Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again" |
| Previous Message | Steve Crawford | 2008-12-01 20:00:03 | Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again" |