| From: | "Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "A(dot) Kretschmer" <andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postgres on shared network drive |
| Date: | 2008-04-11 11:55:40 |
| Message-ID: | 2e78013d0804110455o473e0e7epc480b28e866ef75e@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 1:04 PM, A. Kretschmer
<andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> You idea is complete ill. PostgreSQL is a Server-Client-database, with
> one Server and multiple Clients. You can't access to the same
> database-files with multiple database-servers.
>
I wonder if it would make sense to add support to mount database in
*read-only* mode from multiple servers though. I am thinking about
data warehouse kind of operations where multiple servers can be
used answer read-only queries. Is there a use case for such applications
in real world ?
Thanks,
Pavan
--
Pavan Deolasee
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | J Ottery | 2008-04-11 12:02:21 | Re: Postgres on shared network drive |
| Previous Message | Albe Laurenz | 2008-04-11 11:45:06 | Re: How does psql actually implement the \d commands |