From: | J Ottery <jottery(at)becsystems(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Postgres on shared network drive |
Date: | 2008-04-11 12:02:21 |
Message-ID: | 0c9e4618-e53e-4534-9b84-d47d45a45f32@l28g2000prd.googlegroups.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Apr 11, 5:34 pm, andreas(dot)kretsch(dot)(dot)(dot)(at)schollglas(dot)com ("A.
Kretschmer") wrote:
> am Thu, dem 10.04.2008, um 23:53:18 -0700 mailte J Ottery folgendes:
>
> > Using windows XP and TCP/IP network.
>
> > I install PostgreSQL on a client PC and put the data files on a
> > networked drive (instead of the local drive). Postgres as user and
> > localport. This works well.
>
> > Now I install postgresSQL on another client machine and point it to
> > the same data directory on the network drive.
>
> Sure, you can do that. But there are faster ways to destroy your data.
>
>
>
> > Will this setup work OK for multiple / concurrent users and accessing
> > the same tables on either of the client machines or is there something
> > else I need to be aware of?
>
> You idea is complete ill. PostgreSQL is a Server-Client-database, with
> one Server and multiple Clients. You can't access to the same
> database-files with multiple database-servers.
>
> Andreas
> --
> Andreas Kretschmer
> Kontakt: Heynitz: 035242/47150, D1: 0160/7141639 (mehr: -> Header)
> GnuPG-ID: 0x3FFF606C, privat 0x7F4584DA http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-gene(dot)(dot)(dot)(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
I understand now Andreas. Thanks for the advice.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rodrigo E. De León Plicet | 2008-04-11 12:43:38 | Re: Date / interval question |
Previous Message | Pavan Deolasee | 2008-04-11 11:55:40 | Re: Postgres on shared network drive |