From: | "Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "ITAGAKI Takahiro" <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | "PostgreSQL-development Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: CREATE TABLE, load and freezing |
Date: | 2008-02-28 10:16:50 |
Message-ID: | 2e78013d0802280216of79c5fcw9a04fbedf14b2e1d@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 3:25 PM, ITAGAKI Takahiro
<itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>
>
> Sounds cool. I recommended users to do VACUUM FREEZE just after initial
> loading, but we can avoid it with your method.
>
Yeah, and the additional step of VACUUM FREEZE adds up to the restore
time.
>
> To make things worse, the freezing day comes at once because the first restore
> is done in a single or near transactions; The wraparound timings of many
> tables are aligned at the same time. Freezing copy will be the solution.
>
If we can start with a freezed table and even if the table is
subsequently updated,
hopefully DSM (or something of that sort) will help us reduce the vacuum freeze
time whenever its required.
Thanks,
Pavan
--
Pavan Deolasee
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2008-02-28 10:20:21 | Re: CREATE TABLE, load and freezing |
Previous Message | Pavan Deolasee | 2008-02-28 10:01:00 | Re: CREATE TABLE, load and freezing |