From: | ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | "Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "PostgreSQL-development Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: CREATE TABLE, load and freezing |
Date: | 2008-02-28 09:55:07 |
Message-ID: | 20080228183958.5F5A.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> In a typical scenario, user might create a table and load data in the table as
> part of a single transaction (e.g pg_restore). In this case, it would help if we
> create the tuples in the *frozen* state to avoid any wrap-around related issues
> with the table.
Sounds cool. I recommended users to do VACUUM FREEZE just after initial
loading, but we can avoid it with your method.
> Without this, very large read-only tables would require one round of
> complete freezing if there are lot of transactional activities in the other parts
> of the database. And when that happens, it would generate lots of unnecessary
> IOs on these large tables.
To make things worse, the freezing day comes at once because the first restore
is done in a single or near transactions; The wraparound timings of many
tables are aligned at the same time. Freezing copy will be the solution.
Regards,
---
ITAGAKI Takahiro
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavan Deolasee | 2008-02-28 10:01:00 | Re: CREATE TABLE, load and freezing |
Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2008-02-28 09:45:21 | Re: Varlena Type Creation |