Re: The current shape of PG master-slave replication

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: pgsql-admin(at)kolttonen(dot)fi, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The current shape of PG master-slave replication
Date: 2018-11-15 20:36:29
Message-ID: 2b795cda96ff42967011d585834fe755a6b367c1.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

pgsql-admin(at)kolttonen(dot)fi wrote:
> To be concrete, if I use PG 10.x master-slave replication in production,
> is it very reliable when set up properly?

Absolutely.

PostgreSQL has had streaming replication since version 9.0, and by now
it is rock solid technology. It operates on the same principles as the
crash- and point-in-time-recovery that you already trust.

On top of that, it is amazingly simple to configure, especially since
v10, since now all parameter defaults are already set up for replication.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe
--
Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2018-11-15 20:46:13 Re: checkpoint occurs very often when vacuum full running
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2018-11-15 20:32:18 Re: checkpoint occurs very often when vacuum full running