Re: Confused about gram.y referencs in Makefile?

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Confused about gram.y referencs in Makefile?
Date: 2023-09-25 07:29:16
Message-ID: 2D9B40F9-5C1E-45BF-B23D-AC910F8D16AA@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 25 Sep 2023, at 05:34, Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Maybe be reference src/backend/parser/Makefile is better than current.
>
> How about "See gram.h target's comment in src/backend/parser/Makefile"
> or just "See src/backend/parser/Makefile"?

The latter seems more stable, if the Makefile is ever restructured it's almost
guaranteed that this comment will be missed with the location info becoming
stale.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gurjeet Singh 2023-09-25 07:31:43 Re: [PoC/RFC] Multiple passwords, interval expirations
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-09-25 07:26:38 Re: Various small doc improvements; plpgsql, schemas, permissions, oidvector