Re: Unified server/desktop config

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Surinder Kumar <surinder(dot)kumar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Unified server/desktop config
Date: 2017-08-09 05:47:33
Message-ID: 2CD02DC3-DD05-42C6-B2FC-D46E43FBAB87@pgadmin.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

Please update the patch :-)

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK:http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

> On 9 Aug 2017, at 05:53, Surinder Kumar <surinder(dot)kumar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that test cases don’t run and I got an error:
>
> (pgAdmin_27)Laptop195:regression surinder$ python runtests.py --pkg feature_tests
> <module '__builtin__' (built-in)>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "runtests.py", line 45, in <module>
> import config
> File "/Users/surinder/Documents/Projects/pgadmin4/web/config.py", line 121, in <module>
> if builtins.SERVER_MODE is None:
> AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute'
> SERVER_MODE
> '
>
> I think this is because we are setting​ ​first​ ​builtins.SERVER_MODE​ in​ ​pgAdmin4.py
> but in test cases pgAdmin4.py is not being called.​
>
>
>> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Surinder Kumar <surinder(dot)kumar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 1:47 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 7:18 AM, Surinder Kumar <surinder(dot)kumar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> On Ubuntu-14.04, I got error Application Server couldn't be contacted:
>>>>>
>>>>> Steps performed:
>>>>>
>>>>> I have already installed pgAdmin4-1.4 which come with PostgreSQL-9.6 installer.
>>>>> then I run root(at)ubuntu:/opt/PostgreSQL/9.6/pgAdmin 4/bin# ./pgAdmin4./.
>>>>> Now took latest git pull from HEAD
>>>>> Apply unified_config.diff patch.
>>>>> Then compiled pgAdmin4 in runtime and then run ./pgAdmin.
>>>>> Got error Application Server couldn't be contacted.
>>>>> But when I ran ./pgAdmin4 for the second time. pgAdmin4 runs without any issue.
>>>>> I didn’t get any error on the terminal and log file.
>>>>>
>>>>> ​ I couldn't find why it gives this error.​
>>>>
>>>> I know Fahar has run into this with existing releases on Ubuntu. If you enable debugging, can you see any clues? I assume it's going round the retry loop before aborting?
>>>>> Another issue related to Alembic:
>>>>>
>>>>> If I am running pgAdmin4 already installed on my machine, then I upgrade pgAdmin4 using Python wheel:
>>>>>
>>>>> (test_p27) surinder(at)ubuntu:~/virtualenvs/test_p27$ python ~/virtualenvs/test_p27/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pgadmin4/pgAdmin4.py
>>>>>
>>>>> I am getting error:
>>>>>
>>>>> alembic.util.exc.CommandError: Can't locate revision identified by 'd85a62333272'
>>>>>
>>>>> To fix this, I have to delete existing pgadmin4.db file. I don’t know if it is a valid case or should I log an RM if it is?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That's an annoying side-effect of the move to Alembic. The previous DB code would quite happily (and intentionally) run with a newer version of the database, however, the new code does not. You'll see this issue whenever you've run a newer version of pgAdmin and then go back to an older version that uses an older schema version.
>>>>
>>>> It would be nice to change this so it doesn't complain - but we'd have to be cautious to only break compatibility on major releases.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Apart for this, I didn’t see any functionality break. It works!!
>>>>>
>>>>> I liked the approach to set SEVER_MODE in runtime using built-ins.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks. Do you think it warrants a 2.0 version number, given the potential for breaking existing installations (I do, but would like other feedback)? If we do that - and thus allow a parallel installation of 1.x and 2.x), how would we resolve the Alembic issue you noted such that both versions could be run against the same DB?
>>>
>>> To resolve this issue while upgrading to newer version of pgAdmin4, we can add a parameter version_table: 'alembic_version-1.6 in web/migrations/env.py of upcoming pgAdmin4 source code(reference link)
>>> It will create a new version table in pgadmin4.db database and it will instruct the Alembic to run migrations for the version stored in table(alembic_version-1.6) when new pgAdmin4 will be installed.
>>>
>>> I tried to check if it works or not. But somehow I couldn’t install pgAdmin4-1.5 from wheel.
>>>
>>> Alternatively I will try to generate new schema using in pgAdmin4 source code(Git HEAD). It will generate a new migration version and then i will run pgAdmin4-1.6 from wheel having different migration number. It will create pgadmin4.db for 1.5.
>>>
>>> Then I will run pgAdmin4-1.6 from source code, so migration will take place and hopefully ​the ​same​ ​pgadmin4.db will work for newer pgAdmin4 version.
>>> Reference link where the same issue has been discussed.
>>>
>>
>> Sounds good - please investigate further.
> I spent some time, understands how Alembic works and I thought it is easy using the reference link but not, It needs more R&D. I will look how can we fix it.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Surinder
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Surinder
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 7:01 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Surinder Kumar <surinder(dot)kumar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The patch seems to work in Runtime mode, but fails in Server mode with error:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (pgAdmin_27)Laptop195:pgadmin4 surinder$ python web/pgAdmin4.py
>>>>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>>>>> File "web/pgAdmin4.py", line 55, in <module>
>>>>>>> exec(open(file_quote(setupfile), 'r').read())
>>>>>>> File "<string>", line 35, in <module>
>>>>>>> File "/Users/surinder/Documents/Projects/pgadmin4/web/pgadmin/setup/data_directory.py", line 23, in create_app_data_directory
>>>>>>> _create_directory_if_not_exists(os.path.dirname(config.SQLITE_PATH))
>>>>>>> File "/Users/surinder/Documents/Projects/pgadmin4/web/pgadmin/setup/data_directory.py", line 15, in _create_directory_if_not_exists
>>>>>>> os.mkdir(_path)
>>>>>>> OSError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/lib/pgadmin'
>>>>>>> (pgAdmin_27)Laptop195:pgadmin4 surinder$
>>>>>>> This is because the directory /var/lib/ has root only access and I am running pgAdmin4 with the non-root user.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also pgadmin directory is not created.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (pgAdmin_35)Laptop195:pgadmin4 surinder$ ls /var/lib/pgadmin
>>>>>>> ls: /var/lib/pgadmin: No such file or directory
>>>>>>> I got same error with MacOSX and Ubuntu-14.04 machines irrespective of Python version.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Meanwhile, I am testing patch with other test cases.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's fully expected. In the case of Linux, the packages will be responsible for creating those directories with the appropriate ownership. In other cases, the user would.
>>>>>
>>>>> ​ok, I got it.​
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There's not really much we can do about that - and it's exactly what would happen if you try to run many other packages yourself when standard *nix paths are used.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Surinder
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Surinder Kumar <surinder(dot)kumar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Anyone?
>>>>>>>>> Surinder - please give this one priority.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sure​.​
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ashesh Vashi
>>>>>>>>> EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Attached is a patch that aims to allow us to have a standardised config that will work out of the box for both web and desktop modes. It does this by doing two things:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 1) The runtime sets SERVER_MODE in the Python environment before starting the app. If this value is set, then it overrides the default value of SERVER_MODE in the config.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2) The config file then offers default values for the various file locations for both server and desktop mode, setting them appropriately based on the derived SERVER_MODE value.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The only downsides I can see from this are:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> - You cannot run in server mode in the runtime without manually reconfiguring SERVER_MODE and likely a bunch of paths in config_local.py
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> - If you want to override SERVER_MODE, you'll probably also need to redefine the various paths in config_local.py.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I don't see either being something 99.9% of users would need though.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Can anyone see if the patch breaks anything, or if I missed any side effects?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Is it likely to break things during upgrades? I suspect so... so maybe this should prompt v2.0?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'd appreciate multiple reviews of this, as it could break things. Note that I haven't yet updated the docs.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Dave Page
>>>>>>>>>>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>>>>>>>>>>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>>>>>>>>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Dave Page
>>>>>>>>>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>>>>>>>>>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>>>>>>>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Dave Page
>>>>>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>>>>>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>>>>>
>>>>>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>>>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Dave Page
>>>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>>>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>>>
>>>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dave Page
>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>
>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Surinder Kumar 2017-08-09 06:27:00 Re: Unified server/desktop config
Previous Message Navnath Gadakh 2017-08-09 05:43:41 Re: Build failed in Jenkins: pgadmin4-master-python33 #207