Re: Better way to find long-running queries?

From: Scott Ribe <scott_ribe(at)elevated-dev(dot)com>
To: Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Better way to find long-running queries?
Date: 2024-07-11 16:11:39
Message-ID: 2B0E4039-5871-4E31-920D-772C2377C78E@elevated-dev.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Well, in the past I have approached it from the other end:

(AND query NOT ILIKE ('insert') AND query NOT ILIKE...)

excluding queries I didn't care about

--
Scott Ribe
scott_ribe(at)elevated-dev(dot)com
https://www.linkedin.com/in/scottribe/

> On Jul 11, 2024, at 10:03 AM, Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> This query works, and works quite well, but fails if the query starts with a comment.
>
> So far, I've accepted that "false negative" error, because being too aggressive at finding the word SELECT in a query is a worse problem. (For example, the string "select" might be in a column name that's part of a long-running COPY or ALTER.)
>
> But I've always hoped for something better. Thus: is there any way in SQL to parse pg_stat_activity.query for the purpose of excluding comments?
>
> PG versions 9.6.24 (yes, it's EOL), 14.12, 15.7 and 16.3, if it makes a difference.
>
> SELECT datname,
> pid,
> client_addr,
> client_hostname,
> query_start,
> to_char(EXTRACT(epoch FROM now()-query_start), '99,999.99') as elapsed_secs,
> md5(query)
> pg_stat_activity
> WHERE datname not in ('postgres', 'template0', 'template1')
> AND state != 'idle'
> AND client_hostname !~ 'db[1-8].example.com'
> AND EXTRACT(epoch FROM now() - query_start) > 1800
> AND SUBSTRING(upper(query) from 1 for 6) = 'SELECT';
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message rocky user 2024-07-11 16:38:55 Create Partitions !
Previous Message Ron Johnson 2024-07-11 16:03:22 Better way to find long-running queries?