Re: Parallel WAL Archival Options

From: "Michaeldba(at)sqlexec(dot)com" <Michaeldba(at)sqlexec(dot)com>
To: Nikhil Shetty <nikhil(dot)dba04(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel WAL Archival Options
Date: 2023-08-06 08:26:36
Message-ID: 2A210A32-AB11-4587-9EB6-C0D8626D83E9@sqlexec.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

I am using PGbackrest and I am generating many WALs per second too, and I have no problems keeping up and I am backing them up remotely.

Sent from my iPad

> On Aug 6, 2023, at 3:43 AM, Nikhil Shetty <nikhil(dot)dba04(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi Team,
>
> I would like to know which backup&restore tools will be better for scenarios where the database is generating around 400 WALs per minute.
>
> We are using wal-g but it is not able to keep pace with the wal generation. We increased the upload streams to 256 but no luck
>
> Thanks,
> Nikhil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nikhil Shetty 2023-08-06 10:54:58 Re: Parallel WAL Archival Options
Previous Message Ron 2023-08-06 08:20:36 Re: Parallel WAL Archival Options