Re: Not an error but a difficult wording

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: riivo(dot)kolka(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Not an error but a difficult wording
Date: 2023-01-26 16:34:55
Message-ID: 2971766.1674750895@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> On Wed, 2023-01-25 at 20:39 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'd modify one word in your version:
>>
>>   These tools are not needed to build from a distribution tarball, because
>>   the files generated using these tools are included in the tarball.
>>
>> Or possibly "with" instead of "using"?

> Both are better; I'd lean towards "with".

Done that way then, thanks.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2023-01-30 20:39:32 Re: Suggestion for deprecated spellings
Previous Message PG Doc comments form 2023-01-26 12:19:29 Suggestion for deprecated spellings