| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: No, pg_size_pretty(numeric) was not such a hot idea |
| Date: | 2012-06-05 13:17:39 |
| Message-ID: | 29466.1338902259@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:01 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Assuming that's how 9.2 ships, we might as well wait to see if there
>> are any real complaints from the field before we decide whether any
>> changing is needed.
> We could add it to the catalog without forcing an initdb.
Ugh.
> If we're just leaving it, should we take it off the open items list,
> or leave it in there "in case something else shows up"?
Let's just take it off the list.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-06-05 13:32:08 | "page is not marked all-visible" warning in regression tests |
| Previous Message | Kohei KaiGai | 2012-06-05 13:07:42 | Re: [RFC] Interface of Row Level Security |