From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | "Russ Brown" <postgres(at)dot4dot(dot)plus(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: readline selection (was Re: [GENERAL] psql leaking? - SOLVED) |
Date: | 2004-09-05 16:44:33 |
Message-ID: | 29334.1094402673@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-general |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> (2) fix the readline header selection so that it will only take the
>> headers that correspond to the selected library.
> That sounds like a pretty hard problem to solve.
It didn't seem that bad to me. One problem is to not select, eg,
<readline/readline.h> in preference to <editline/readline.h> if we've
selected libedit for linking to. (I think that is the behavior that
bit Russ.) But that seems a small matter of paying attention to a flag
variable set by PGAC_CHECK_READLINE. The other problem is that if we
select <readline.h> we can't really be sure it matches the selected
library. I'm not sure that we *need* to solve that --- if you have
readline.so and not <readline/readline.h> then <readline.h> had better
be the right thing. But I would think it could be done with some
appropriate AC_EGREP_HEADER check if you wanted to be paranoid.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2004-09-05 17:18:33 | Re: plpgsql error handling bug |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-09-05 16:21:58 | Re: Permissions problem with sequences |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud | 2004-09-05 17:34:46 | Re: Index on TEXT versus CHAR(32)... fast exact TEXT matching |
Previous Message | Wes | 2004-09-05 15:47:32 | Re: How to determine a database is intact? |