| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Russ Brown" <postgres(at)dot4dot(dot)plus(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: readline selection (was Re: [GENERAL] psql leaking? - SOLVED) |
| Date: | 2004-09-05 06:50:00 |
| Message-ID: | 200409050850.00860.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote:
> (1) modify PGAC_CHECK_READLINE so that it really does prefer readline
> over libedit consistently. I think all this would take is switching
> the loop order:
>
> for pgac_rllib in -lreadline -ledit ; do
> for pgac_lib in "" " -ltermcap" " -lncurses" " -lcurses" ; do
>
> but possibly I'm missing something.
That seems reasonable. I'm not really sure why the loops are nested the
other way.
> (2) fix the readline header selection so that it will only take the
> headers that correspond to the selected library. These libraries are
> more or less source-compatible but they do not have the same ABI, so
> mix-and-match is not going to work.
That sounds like a pretty hard problem to solve.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Harald Armin Massa | 2004-09-05 10:20:39 | Failed to connect to database - further investigations |
| Previous Message | Wes | 2004-09-05 04:37:05 | "make check" failure on 8.0 b2 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Google Mike | 2004-09-05 11:20:43 | Re: HOWTO: Get a table or database definition |
| Previous Message | Mike Nolan | 2004-09-05 02:58:19 | Re: How to determine a database is intact? |