Re: BUG #2162: Same as bug #1679 - finite() - unresolved symbol

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, flconseil(at)yahoo(dot)fr
Subject: Re: BUG #2162: Same as bug #1679 - finite() - unresolved symbol
Date: 2006-01-12 08:57:13
Message-ID: 2926.1137056233@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Am Mittwoch, 11. Januar 2006 22:33 schrieb Tom Lane:
>> I suppose though that there's some chance of the constant-argument case
>> being treated differently from not-constant, so your idea has some merit.

> Use a global rather than a local variable.

In principle an aggressive compiler could still determine that the
global variable is modified nowhere else in the executable. In practice
that will probably get the job done ... this year anyway ...

I did like Franois' idea of using argc, but the present autoconf
infrastructure doesn't seem to allow it :-(

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message flaupretre 2006-01-12 11:14:49 Re: BUG #2162: Same as bug #1679 - finite() - unresolved symbol
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-01-12 08:24:45 Re: BUG #2162: Same as bug #1679 - finite() - unresolved symbol