Re: BUG #2162: Same as bug #1679 - finite() - unresolved symbol

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, flconseil(at)yahoo(dot)fr
Subject: Re: BUG #2162: Same as bug #1679 - finite() - unresolved symbol
Date: 2006-01-12 13:28:45
Message-ID: 200601121428.46471.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Am Donnerstag, 12. Januar 2006 09:57 schrieb Tom Lane:
> In principle an aggressive compiler could still determine that the
> global variable is modified nowhere else in the executable.

I think to do that the compiler would have to prove what the dynamic linker
will do at run time.

> I did like François' idea of using argc, but the present autoconf
> infrastructure doesn't seem to allow it :-(

Maybe their use is unportable. :-)

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-01-12 17:14:54 Re: BUG #2166: attempted to update invisible tuple
Previous Message Euler Taveira de Oliveira 2006-01-12 12:21:24 Re: BUG #2166: attempted to update invisible tuple