Re: Re: kerberos 5 patch against 7.0RC5

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Mike Wyer <mw(at)doc(dot)ic(dot)ac(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: kerberos 5 patch against 7.0RC5
Date: 2000-05-11 06:09:20
Message-ID: 29254.958025360@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Can someone comment on this patch? It looks good to me.

Looks like a rather major rewrite of the Kerberos support --- do we feel
comfortable cramming this into 7.0.1? Seems like putting it into the
7.1 cycle might be the prudent course, so that it will get some beta
testing before being loosed upon the world. (Alternatively, if a couple
other Kerberos users want to try it and report back, I'd feel better
about dropping it into 7.0.* ...)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-05-11 06:26:50 Re: misc questions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-05-11 06:04:30 Re: Re: Patches to fix compilations on NetBSD