From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Johnny C(dot) Lam" <lamj(at)stat(dot)cmu(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: Patches to fix compilations on NetBSD |
Date: | 2000-05-11 06:04:30 |
Message-ID: | 29229.958025070@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Can someone comment on this patch? It appears it should be applied.
At least some of it is likely to break changes that I made to ensure
that pltcl and plperl would build correctly when Tcl and Perl have
been compiled with a different compiler than was selected for the
Postgres build. It is *not* appropriate to import Postgres compiler
switches into these subsystems that may be getting built with a
different compiler. (-I is pretty universal, so it's safe, but
the outer CPPFLAGS might contain stuff that's not safe at all.)
>> 3) I couldn't find anything in the tree which still needs
>> ncurses/curses. I removed the check for those libraries from
>> configure.in. If I'm wrong please let me know.
Hmm, might be OK or not. There used to be curses-dependent code
in libpq's "fe-print" module, no? Is that gone?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-05-11 06:09:20 | Re: Re: kerberos 5 patch against 7.0RC5 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-05-11 05:51:57 | Re: Patches list broken? |