Re: binary operators on integers

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Marko Kreen <marko(at)l-t(dot)ee>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: binary operators on integers
Date: 2000-10-17 04:07:32
Message-ID: 29207.971755652@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Can someone comment on this?

We were debating what to do about the precedence issues; see
followup messages. I have no problem with adding functions
like this, just gotta pick the operator names and precedences...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-10-17 04:14:35 Re: pgsql is 75 times faster with my new index scan
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-10-17 04:04:50 Re: "initdb -t" destroys all databases

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Hollomon 2000-10-17 14:26:57 Re: Re: New relkind for views
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-10-17 04:00:51 Re: binary operators on integers