From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> |
Cc: | devik(at)cdi(dot)cz, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql is 75 times faster with my new index scan |
Date: | 2000-10-17 04:14:35 |
Message-ID: | 200010170414.AAA08100@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > TODO:
> > - add HeapTupleHeaderData into each IndexTupleData
> > - change code to reflect above
> > - when deleting-updating heap then also update tuples'
> > HeapTupleHeaderData in indices
>
> I doubt everyone would like trading query speed for insert/update
> speed plus index size
If he is scanning through the entire index, he could do a sequential
scan of the table, grab all the tid transaction status values, and use
those when viewing the index. No need to store/update the transaction
status in the index that way.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2000-10-17 04:17:53 | Re: length coerce for bpchar is broken since 7.0 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-10-17 04:07:32 | Re: binary operators on integers |