Re: Need --without-docs build switch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Need --without-docs build switch
Date: 2009-12-10 18:26:54
Message-ID: 29120.1260469614@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> On 12/10/09 10:03 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>>> Testing Alpha2 with the Exclusion Constraints patch on Mac recently
>>> forced me to edit the makefiles to remove the make docs statements.
>>
>> How so? The make process does not try to build the docs unless you
>> specifically tell it to.

> It most certainly did with Alpha2.

Hm, maybe the alpha2 tarball had docs in it already? And they weren't
up to date? You might be hitting the same thing I've complained of:
since "make distclean" no longer removes built docs, you can find
yourself running an update cycle when you didn't want to. Peter
rejected my opinion that we should go back to the old behavior of
"make distclean", but I'm still not happy about it.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-08/msg01336.php

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2009-12-10 18:29:01 Re: Need --without-docs build switch
Previous Message Ron Mayer 2009-12-10 18:22:09 Re: explain output infelicity in psql