From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Need --without-docs build switch |
Date: | 2009-12-10 18:26:54 |
Message-ID: | 29120.1260469614@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> On 12/10/09 10:03 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>>> Testing Alpha2 with the Exclusion Constraints patch on Mac recently
>>> forced me to edit the makefiles to remove the make docs statements.
>>
>> How so? The make process does not try to build the docs unless you
>> specifically tell it to.
> It most certainly did with Alpha2.
Hm, maybe the alpha2 tarball had docs in it already? And they weren't
up to date? You might be hitting the same thing I've complained of:
since "make distclean" no longer removes built docs, you can find
yourself running an update cycle when you didn't want to. Peter
rejected my opinion that we should go back to the old behavior of
"make distclean", but I'm still not happy about it.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-08/msg01336.php
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-12-10 18:29:01 | Re: Need --without-docs build switch |
Previous Message | Ron Mayer | 2009-12-10 18:22:09 | Re: explain output infelicity in psql |