From: | lin <jluwln(at)163(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_restore -n sch1 : schema "sch1" does not exist |
Date: | 2014-12-09 23:18:34 |
Message-ID: | 28e393c6.11760.14a3158d97e.Coremail.jluwln@163.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Are you sure it is a bug and you have fixed it? I test it with postgresql-9.4rcl, the result is the same with postgresql-9.3 beta2.
At 2014-12-09 23:54:01, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>lin <jluwln(at)163(dot)com> writes:
>> I create a schema (sch1) in the database of db1, and I also create a table sch1.t1, then I use the comand "pg_dump -d db1 -Fd -f dir1" to back up the database of db1; at lase I drop the schema of sch1; I want to restore the schema sch1, but when I execute the command "pg_restore -d db1 -Fd dir1 -n sch1", get error, just like below.
>> I just want to test the parameter of "-n" for pg_restore, how can do to use the pg_restore correctly?
>
>Well, you could adopt an actually supported release:
>
>> ; Dumped from database version: 9.3beta2
>> ; Dumped by pg_dump version: 9.3beta2
>
>I'm not just being snarky: the messages you're getting here remind me of a
>bug we fixed some time ago. But even aside from this specific complaint,
>the list of known data-loss bugs in 9.3beta should terrify you. Why in
>the world are you still using it?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
>--
>Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>To make changes to your subscription:
>http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2014-12-10 00:00:29 | Re: pg_restore -n sch1 : schema "sch1" does not exist |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-12-09 22:32:30 | Re: Speeding up an in-progress wraparound-preventing vacuum |