| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | blaz(at)merela(dot)org, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Typo |
| Date: | 2017-12-18 21:14:13 |
| Message-ID: | 28908563-4c3a-c29e-7657-359ce2cc0aa0@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On 12/12/17 11:26, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 12/12/17 07:02, blaz(at)merela(dot)org wrote:
>> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>>
>> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/using-explain.html
>> Description:
>>
>> "The costs of the loop node are then set on the basis of the cost of the
>> outer scan, plus one repetition of the inner scan for each outer row (10 *
>> 7.87, here), plus a little CPU time for join processing."
>>
>> Shouldn't it be "10 * 7.91" inside the braces?
>
> Yes. That wasn't updated when the EXPLAIN output was regenerated some
> time ago. Do you see any other numbers in the next that don't match the
> EXPLAIN output?
Fixes committed
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | PG Doc comments form | 2017-12-18 21:30:41 | pg_upgrade docs are confusing if PostgreSQL's versioning system/language isn't known to reader |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2017-12-18 15:47:48 | Change to docs reporting form |