| From: | PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | jim(at)room118solutions(dot)com |
| Subject: | pg_upgrade docs are confusing if PostgreSQL's versioning system/language isn't known to reader |
| Date: | 2017-12-18 21:30:41 |
| Message-ID: | 20171218213041.25744.8414@wrigleys.postgresql.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/pgupgrade.html
Description:
If a reader who is unfamiliar with PostgreSQL's versioning (where 9.5 and
9.6 are considered major versions) reads the documentation, it is unclear if
they need to use pg_upgrade to migrate from 9.5 to 9.6, for example.
The documentation says upgrading "from 9.6.3 to the current major release"
requires pg_upgrade, but not "from 9.6.2 to 9.6.3".
The problem with that language is that the current release of PostgreSQL is
10. So is pg_upgrade required to upgrade from 9.6.3 to current (10) because
9 and 10 are major versions or because 9.6 and 10.0 are major versions? (the
latter).
It would be clearer if the documentation covered all three cases:
9.6.3 -> 10.0.0 and 9.5.1 -> 9.6.3: pg_upgrade should be used
9.6.2 -> 9.6.3: pg_upgrade not needed
Or if the documentation simply noted that the second decimal is considered a
major release.
Thanks for PostgreSQL!
Jim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-12-19 20:20:38 | remove endterms and title ids |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-12-18 21:14:13 | Re: Typo |