Re: Announcing Veil

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Marc Munro <marc(at)bloodnok(dot)com>, veil-general(at)pgfoundry(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Announcing Veil
Date: 2005-10-07 03:51:08
Message-ID: 28907.1128657068@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I don't see NUM_USER_DEFINED_LWLOCKS defined in 8.0 or 8.1, so what
> system do you propose to allow you to set this value?

I'd be willing to add the proposed patch in 8.1 (style note:
NUM_USER_DEFINED_LWLOCKS should be set in pg_config_manual.h not
lwlock.h). However, it's certainly not going to magically appear in
existing releases, so I dunno if that'd make Marc happy or not.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-10-07 03:52:29 Re: Announcing Veil
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-10-07 03:41:36 Re: Announcing Veil