| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Marc Munro <marc(at)bloodnok(dot)com>, veil-general(at)pgfoundry(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Announcing Veil |
| Date: | 2005-10-07 03:52:29 |
| Message-ID: | 200510070352.j973qTO10804@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I don't see NUM_USER_DEFINED_LWLOCKS defined in 8.0 or 8.1, so what
> > system do you propose to allow you to set this value?
>
> I'd be willing to add the proposed patch in 8.1 (style note:
> NUM_USER_DEFINED_LWLOCKS should be set in pg_config_manual.h not
> lwlock.h). However, it's certainly not going to magically appear in
> existing releases, so I dunno if that'd make Marc happy or not.
Shouldn't it be something we can put in postgresql.conf?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2005-10-07 03:54:13 | Re: [HACKERS] Patching dblink.c to avoid warning about open transaction |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-10-07 03:51:08 | Re: Announcing Veil |