Re: Column as result of subtraction of two other columns?

From: Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jean-Luc Lachance <jllachan(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, Mark Cave-Ayland <m(dot)cave-ayland(at)webbased(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Column as result of subtraction of two other columns?
Date: 2004-08-23 16:59:04
Message-ID: 288ki01a8oo4598h7effii1p6iqn244sq6@email.aon.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 12:04:54 -0400, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> select sum(x), sum(y), sum(x)-sum(y) from ...
>
>At least since 7.4, the system will notice the duplicate aggregates
>and run only two summations to compute the above, followed by a single
>subtraction at the end. The apparently more intelligent way suggested
>by Jean will have to run three summations, and thus end up being a net
>loss.

Also note that Jean-Luc's
select sum( x), sum( y), sum(x-y) from whatever group by z;
gives a different result in the presence of NULLs.

Servus
Manfred

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message A Palmblad 2004-08-23 17:51:21 Re: database troubles - various errors
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2004-08-23 16:56:26 Re: Why does =ANY(<array>) need an extra cast when used