From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Jean-Luc Lachance <jllachan(at)sympatico(dot)ca> |
Cc: | Mark Cave-Ayland <m(dot)cave-ayland(at)webbased(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Column as result of subtraction of two other columns? |
Date: | 2004-07-16 16:04:54 |
Message-ID: | 21439.1089993894@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Jean-Luc Lachance <jllachan(at)sympatico(dot)ca> writes:
> Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
>> I'm trying to calculate an output column which is the difference of two
>> other columns in the query output; the first column is an aggregate of
>> items in stock, while the second column is an aggregate of items which
>> have been used.
> You can also do:
> select sum( x), sum( y), sum(x-y) from whatever group by z;
Mark would actually be best off to do this in the straightforward
fashion and not try to be cute about it:
select sum(x), sum(y), sum(x)-sum(y) from ...
At least since 7.4, the system will notice the duplicate aggregates
and run only two summations to compute the above, followed by a single
subtraction at the end. The apparently more intelligent way suggested
by Jean will have to run three summations, and thus end up being a net
loss.
The various subselect notations mentioned elsewhere in the thread may
save a bit of typing, if your column calculations are hairy expressions
and not just "sum(foo)", but they probably won't save any runtime.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jean-Luc Lachance | 2004-07-16 17:01:00 | Re: Column as result of subtraction of two other columns? |
Previous Message | Mark Cave-Ayland | 2004-07-16 15:36:24 | Re: Column as result of subtraction of two other columns? |