Re: Process priority.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Theo Galanakis <Theo(dot)Galanakis(at)lonelyplanet(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Process priority.
Date: 2005-03-18 00:06:01
Message-ID: 28823.1111104361@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Theo Galanakis <Theo(dot)Galanakis(at)lonelyplanet(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> I wrote a C program that can be called through postgres via stored
> procedures. It allows you to change the current postmaster process priority.

You are aware that that's widely considered either useless or
counterproductive? Renice-ing one backend seldom gives helpful results,
because (a) what usually matters more than CPU usage is I/O, and renice
doesn't change I/O priorities; (b) priority inversion results in
higher-priority backends blocking behind the low-priority one whenever
it's managed to acquire a lock.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Theo Galanakis 2005-03-18 00:32:41 Re: Process priority.
Previous Message Andrew Hammond 2005-03-17 23:35:39 Re: Consecutive row count query