Re: [HACKERS] header files for spi.h/trigger.h]

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Brook Milligan <brook(at)trillium(dot)NMSU(dot)Edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] header files for spi.h/trigger.h]
Date: 1999-07-15 00:34:37
Message-ID: 28671.931998877@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> Speaking of header files, I'm pretty sure that not enough header files
>> get installed in order to compile something using spi.h/trigger.h
>> outside the postgresql source tree. This seems like a problem.
>>
>> Shouldn't the normal install procedure install everything necessary to
>> use published postgresql header files?

> Good questions. I am not touching spi.h because I realize they are used
> by client code.

But how much of the stuff that those files are including is really
needed to compile them? It could be that the right answer is not to
install more headers but to get rid of some #includes in the headers
that are published...

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Uncle George 1999-07-15 00:39:24 Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 1999-07-15 00:25:07 RE: [HACKERS] Interesting behaviour !