Re: [HACKERS] header files for spi.h/trigger.h]

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Brook Milligan <brook(at)trillium(dot)NMSU(dot)Edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] header files for spi.h/trigger.h]
Date: 1999-07-15 03:08:23
Message-ID: 199907150308.XAA27222@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> Speaking of header files, I'm pretty sure that not enough header files
> >> get installed in order to compile something using spi.h/trigger.h
> >> outside the postgresql source tree. This seems like a problem.
> >>
> >> Shouldn't the normal install procedure install everything necessary to
> >> use published postgresql header files?
>
> > Good questions. I am not touching spi.h because I realize they are used
> > by client code.
>
> But how much of the stuff that those files are including is really
> needed to compile them? It could be that the right answer is not to
> install more headers but to get rid of some #includes in the headers
> that are published...

I am doing that will all the other include files, but because spi.h is
used in contrib, I assume they want some stuff auto-included with spi.h.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-07-15 03:13:44 Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha
Previous Message Uncle George 1999-07-15 00:39:24 Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha