| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Justin Clift <jc(at)telstra(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Bug with view definitions? |
| Date: | 2004-07-01 17:09:45 |
| Message-ID: | 28531.1088701785@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org> writes:
> The view itself works, so it must be the pretty
> printer that is broken (where ever that is hidden away in the code).
Yeah, I think this is due to overenthusiastic removal of parentheses.
I believe if you pg_dump the view you will get a correctly parenthesized
version, because pg_dump does not trust the pretty printer (for reasons
that should now be obvious...)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2004-07-01 17:23:10 | Re: Adding column comment to information_schema.columns |
| Previous Message | Dennis Bjorklund | 2004-07-01 17:07:31 | Re: Adding column comment to information_schema.columns |