Re: Adding column comment to information_schema.columns

From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
To: jearl(at)bullysports(dot)com
Cc: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, Justin Clift <jc(at)telstra(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Adding column comment to information_schema.columns
Date: 2004-07-01 17:23:10
Message-ID: 20040701172310.GA2908@wolff.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 10:38:02 -0600,
jearl(at)bullysports(dot)com wrote:
> Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> writes:
>
> Yes, but if folks wanted to stick to the standard PostgreSQL would
> still work. The only difference is that people who aren't concerned
> about being more tied to PostgreSQL would get some extra features.

Is there any provision in the information schema part of the standard for
vendor specific extensions?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-07-01 17:30:59 Re: Adding column comment to information_schema.columns
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-07-01 17:09:45 Re: Bug with view definitions?