Re: No toast table for pg_shseclabel but for pg_seclabel

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: No toast table for pg_shseclabel but for pg_seclabel
Date: 2014-10-11 20:40:39
Message-ID: 28520.1413060039@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 10:53:15AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> So maybe we should get rid of the toast table for pg_seclabel. One less
>> catalog table for a feature that hardly anyone is using seems like a fine
>> idea to me ...

> Is this still an open item?

I haven't done anything about it ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2014-10-11 21:15:58 Re: Shapes on the regression test for polygon
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2014-10-11 20:40:29 Re: Performance regression: 9.2+ vs. ScalarArrayOpExpr vs. ORDER BY