Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Not sure if Andres is working on that for now or not, the main
> discussion that I am foreseeing here is how we are going to map elevel
> for the frontend (should FATAL, PANIC exit immediately, etc).
Doesn't seem that complicated to me: elevel >= ERROR results in exit(1),
otherwise just print to stderr and return. We'd be eyeballing each case
that we remove "#ifndef FRONTEND" from anyway; if it's expecting behavior
noticeably more complicated than that, we could leave it as-is.
> Stability of 9.6 is first and just ahead.
Agreed, this is code cleanup not a high priority.
regards, tom lane