Re: Two test failures on v16 (compared to v14)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dominique Devienne <ddevienne(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Two test failures on v16 (compared to v14)
Date: 2024-02-14 15:09:26
Message-ID: 2840272.1707923366@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Dominique Devienne <ddevienne(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Just an FYI. Running the same test suite against V16 triggered two failures.
> ...
> Second, a LO test failed to open a given OID.
> The test starts a read-only transaction, then tries a loOpen(oid,
> INV_WRITE),
> but does only a loRead(). Now in v16, the loOpen fails, returning -1, while
> it used to be OK.
> So this must be a bug fix of some kind I guess. Using INV_READ fixed the
> test.

Yup, see commit 55f480278

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2024-02-14 15:22:21 Re: Postgres pg_cron extension
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2024-02-14 15:02:37 Re: Using a Conversion Table